Where Forgotten Films Dwell

Welcome to this site! It exists for one reason: to preserve the memory of films that have been forgotten about or under-appreciated throughout the ages. Take a seat, read an entry, leave a comment. You might discover your new favorite movie!

Monday, June 20, 2011

NEXT BLOGATHON: MONSTER MOVIE MANIA!!!!!!

Well folks....I guess that with the sterling and unprecedented success of this blogathon, it's time ot announce the next one.  According to the poll, the winner is MONSTER MOVIES!!!


Coincidentally...I'm amazed that no one chose to blog about this Corman classic.  I mean...it was even on MST3K!!

This time around there are only two rules requirements to this blogathon....

1) The film must be from 1950-1959.
2) The film must be centered around a MONSTER!!


Oh...and did I mention that this time around...the film can be from ANY COUNTRY??

ANY.

Also, in this blogathon, the definition of "monster" will be relatively liberal.  A monster can be anything from a hideous creature to an alien to a robot.


Awwwwwww yeah.

And, of course, monsters include deformed or mutated humans.


Now...some of you may be thinking that monster movies aren't worth your time...that monster movies were never good.

You'd be WRONG.


Check and mate.

Monster movies in the 50s were some of the most interpretively rich in film history.  Monsters represented everything from fears concerning Communism...



...nuclear radiation....


...to...whatever the hell this is.


If any of you have doubts about the genre, let me know and I will GLADLY give you suggestions of great films that you can watch.

People were curious if it would take place in either July or August.  So...both!  This blogathon will take place from July 27-August 3.  That gives us about 5 weeks to recruit bloggers, watch movies, and write.

I want to personally ask all of you to participate again in this great endeavor.  Also...let's set a new goal for participants.  This past blogathon we got 21 participants...this time...let's aim for 40!

I want all of you to contact your blogger friends or people who you think might be interested and ask them to participate.  Together...we CAN do this!

In the following week, I will post the official blogathon banner that you can all post on your sites.

And to answer your questions...yes...there will be awards...and prizes.

MORE awards.

And of course...MORE prizes!!

Also...because I'll be attending a new school, my email has changed.  If you are interested, or have questions or suggestions, post a comment here or send me an email at nch257@nyu.edu.

Well folks...we have 5 weeks...let's make this the best blogathon YET!!!!

Editor-in-Chief
Nathanael Hood

Quick Question: Next Blogathon

Well folks...I've got a question for you all.........

I'm planning the next blogathon as we speak.  I just wanted to ask you....

When would you be willing to participate in another blogathon?

I would love to do the next one in approximately one month, from July 17-19.  But I don't want to do it if it would be too soon.

See...21 people participated in this blogathon.  I want to see if we can get up to 40 for the next one!

That's right...40 participants!!

And yes...there will be awards...

And prizes...MORE prizes...

It is my earnest hope that all of the people who participated will come back for the next one...but if one month is not enough prep time...I can stretch it out until August.   Leave a comment or send me an email to let me know what you all think.

P.S. - Only 12 people have voted for Bloggers' Choice so far.  Get those votes in, folks!  It's close!  VERY close!

Sunday, June 19, 2011

Voting for Bloggers' Choice

Well, as the sun goes down on day three, the Roger Corman blogathon must come to a close. I want to thank everyone for their participation, kindness, and enthusiasm during the whole thing!  I'll post a more detailed thank you letter later this week.  But first, we have business to attend to:

The Bloggers' Choice Award!

Here's how it works:

-Every participating blogger gets one vote for the Readers' Choice Award.
-To vote, send an email with your name, blog, and choice to nahood@ursinus.edu.
-YOU CAN NOT VOTE FOR YOURSELF!!!!!
-In the case of a tie, I will cast the tie-breaking vote.
-The winner will be announced on Tuesday and be awarded with a custom-made commemorative banner that they can display on their site.
-I will contact them via email to discuss which 3 Roger Corman movies they would like for their prize.
-Voting will continue until midnight Monday night.
-IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED BY MIDNIGHT ON MONDAY, YOUR VOTE WILL BE DISQUALIFIED!!!

Well, there are the rules!

I look forward to handing out the very first blogathon award here at Forgotten Classics of Yesteryear!

Editor-in-Chief
Nathanael Hood

Saturday, June 18, 2011

Chris Michael's Review of FRANKENSTEIN UNBOUND

The rest of today's entries are listed in the next post.



Although Frankenstein Unbound was the final film directed by Roger Corman, it just so happened to be the first Corman movie I had ever seen. The first time I had seen it was two summers ago and I had no expectations. I saw that a time travel movie involving Frankenstein and starring John Hurt and Raul Julia was coming on cable soon and with that information alone I knew that I had to watch it! I had heard of Roger Corman before, but at the time I did not really know how influential he was to the film industry, just that he made some B-movies. 



Unlike other many other Corman movies, this one did not launch any careers. John Hurt had already been nominated for two Oscars and Raul Julia was known for his performances in Kiss of the Spider Woman (1985) and Romero (1989). That said, this is an early film of Bridget Fonda, although she will most likely always be best known not such much for her acting career, but simply for being the daughter of Henry Fonda and niece of Jane Fonda. 



The aforementioned John Hurt plays Dr. Joe Buchanan. Dr. Buchanan is a scientist of the near future whose experiments have pushed past the limits of nature with unintended but dangerous consequences. While performing experiments to create a powerful weapon with the intention to end war while also not harming the environment, Buchanan and his team of researchers discover that the weapon also has the side effect of creating random rifts in the space time continuum. At first Buchanan is confident that he can find a way around this. One day while driving home from work he encounters some children burying a bike that has “died” because its owner has bought a newer more advanced bicycle. As Dr. Buchanan is musing (“Progresss!”) over this bizarre scene, an unusual storm is brewing. Buchanan is able to get the children to safety even though a warrior on a horse emerges from the storm and almost hits him with a spear! Unfortunately, Buchanan is sucked into the storm and sent across time and space. Eventually he figures out that he is in 1816 Switzerland. Buchanan meets up with some historical figures: the poet Percy and his wife, author Mary Shelley (Bridget Fonda) while he tries to find a way to reverse the time slip and return home. However, Buchanan discovers that a certain Victor Frankenstein (Raul Julia) is living in the nearby Swiss village. Like us, Buchanan always thought that Frankenstein was a work of fiction, but it turns out Mary Shelley’s novel was actually based on true events! As a fellow scientist who has had to deal with his own experiments going horribly wrong despite having the best of intentions, Buchanan tries to help Frankenstein. However, he fails to get Frankenstein to admit that his monster (which is legitimately creepy with a good make-up job) killed a child which leads to the nanny being accused of the murder and later being executed. Buchanan tries to stop Frankenstein and his monster from ending up like the novel, while also attempting to get home and stop the time slips. Despite the title Frankenstein Unbound, the story is always about Buchanan and his struggle to deal with his metaphorical monster (the time slips) which make Frankenstein’s monster powerless in comparison, but an intriguing parallel.



Watching Buchanan’s interactions with the Swiss in 1816 as a man from 2031 are not only amusing but also interesting as he can do whatever he wants. Unlike the main characters in most other time travel movies Buchanan, does not really need to worry about keeping the timeline intact since the randomness of the time slips has already done significant damage. Therefore the story can follow the character more freely as he explores 1816 while stranded in the past.

If the time slips depicted in this movie were real perhaps Roger Corman would have cast Vincent Price as Dr. Buchanan since, intentionally or not, Hurt seems to be channeling Price in his role. Hurt hams it up, but the end result is pure fun. The best examples of this are the priceless scenes between Dr. Buchanan and his talking car. The car has a sexy female voice and although there is no human avatar for the car, its personality is fully developed with witty dialogue, showing that technology may one day come back to haunt us with snide remarks! When Buchanan is still trying to figure out where and when the time slip has taken him, he exclaims “Jesus H. Christ, where am I?!” to which the car responds “No record of a middle initial for a Jesus Christ, Dr. Buchanan” which Hurt’s character does not find very amusing. The car’s lines such as “Something tells me we are not in New Los Angeles anymore” and “Scientifically speaking, we are out in the sticks” could have been classic Spock phrases on Star Trek. Buchanan humorously treats the car like a real person. When he must leave it to go back to the Swiss village he has been staying at, Buchanan hides the car and tells her to “be a good girl” to which the car responds, “My options are limited!” While one might simply write off the car as comic relief in the vein of C-3PO and R2-D2, or in this case more appropriately KITT from Knight Rider, I argue that its role is a little deeper. The car itself is like Frankenstein’s monster as it blurs the line between human and inhuman. The car appears to be sentient but is it alive? Likewise, is the monster simply animate or truly alive?



While Roger Corman co-wrote the screenplay for Frankenstein Unbound, it is important to keep in mind that this movie is actually based on a book by British science fiction author Brian Aldiss. Aldiss is a prolific writer, but for better or worse will be best known for writing the short story “Super-Toys Last All Summer Long” which was the basis for the 2001 film A.I. Artificial Intelligence. A.I. was originally developed by Stanley Kubrick and finally directed after his death by Steven Spielberg. Corman was no stranger to adapting the works of others (most famously Edgar Allan Poe but also others such as H.P. Lovecraft). While I have not actually read Aldiss’ novel, from what I have read about the novel it appears that Corman has stuck to the original story much closer than his previous adaptations of other works.

There are two fun cameos in this movie that you will want to keep an eye out for. The now deceased Michael Hutchence, lead singer of INXS (“New Sensation,” “What you Need”) puts in a fine cameo as the famous Romantic poet Percy Bysshe Shelley! Also look out for Catherine Corman, Roger Corman’s daughter, who played Justine Moritz, a woman tried and condemned as a witch.

Although Frankenstein Unbound has generally been considered to be mediocre at best, I contend that this is a fine B-movie with better acting and cinematography (filming on location in Italy certainly helped) than most of its ilk. The plot is pretty unique, and the only movie I can think of which comes close is the wonderful Nicolas Meyer directed film Time After Time (1979). In this film, Jack the Ripper (David Warner) uses H.G. Wells’ time machine to escape to the future. H.G. Wells (Malcolm McDowell) must stop him from murdering women in 1979 San Francisco! Time After Time is the better of the two movies, but if you liked one I imagine you would also enjoy the other. 



While I will always have a special place in my heart for Frankenstein Unbound, it is by no means a perfect movie. For example, Buchanan can magically understand everyone in the Swiss village, not just the English-speaking Percy and Mary Shelley. This is not uncommon in science fiction but at least Star Trek mentions the use of universal translators. I feel that some sort of explanation should have been given, or maybe the car could have been somehow used to translate for Buchanan! Perhaps the bigger issue is Buchanan’s persistence in following Dr. Frankenstein. His frequent meetings often feel forced and one wonders why he isn’t spending more time getting it on with the beautiful Mary Shelley instead of getting involved with Victor Frankenstein who he has no real stake in. I know that Buchanan sees some parallels between Frankenstein and himself but I’m not sure if that is enough motivation as to why his character is risking his life to stop Victor. Yes, a few people are being killed by the monster but the damage from the time slip makes these deaths seem miniscule in comparison. Plus since Buchanan discovers that Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is actually non-fiction, he knows the murders will end soon with or without his involvement. The movie runs a sleek 82 minutes so perhaps this was answered in the book, an earlier version of the screenplay, or deleted scenes and was cut later. 



Very few, if any, movies are perfect, but it is easy to overlook these flaws since the story is immersive and allows for easy suspension of disbelief. Frankenstein Unbound keeps us entertained as we want to know what Buchanan will do next as well as if Victor Frankenstein and his monster will meet different fates than in the original Frankenstein. It is fitting that Frankenstein Unbound was Corman’s last at the director’s chair. Frankenstein, Buchanan, and Corman all created new things. While Frankenstein’s monster and Buchanan’s time rifts ended poorly, Corman’s monsters continue to entertain and have a lasting positive effect on the film industry.



Frankenstein Unbound is currently on Youtube in six parts.

Part One: www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjeKBeCcWzQ

BLOGATHON DAY #3

This is it folks!  Day #3 of Forgotten Classics of Yesteryear's Roger Corman Blogathon!!



Before we begin...there are three quick points of business to get to...

1) LEAVE COMMENTS

Not only is it polite, but it helps create an interblog dialogue that will help boost our community!  So show you care!  Leave a comment!

2) Chris' Review of "Frankenstein Unbound" will be posted on this blog later today.

My good friend Chris wanted to participate in this blogathon, but doesn't have a blog.  So I will be posting his review on this site later today.  He's working on his own blog right now and there will be an announcement on this site when it is set up!

3) MORE PRIZES!!

I have decided to add one more prize to the list.......

The winner of the Readers' Choice Blogger's Award will also receive three Roger Corman movies of their choice, up to a value of $60!!

That's $120 worth of prizes that we (meaning ME) will be giving away this blogathon!  So be sure to do your best!  Now...let's get on to business!  Today's participants are:



The Intruder
Jack Lunt 
http://jacklfilmreviews.blogspot.com/2011/06/roger-corman-blogathon-intruder-1962.html


The Masque of the Red Death
S.M. Rana 
http://smrana.blogspot.com/search/label/The%20Masque%20of%20the%20Red%20Death


 The Raven
Michael Troutman
http://ishootthepictures.blogspot.com/2011/06/roger-corman-blogathon-raven-1963.html


A Bucket of Blood 
Ivan G Shreve Jr 
http://thrillingdaysofyesteryear.blogspot.com/2011/06/roger-corman-blogathon-bucket-of-blood.html


X: The Man With the X-Ray Eyes
Team Bartilucci 
http://doriantb.blogspot.com/2011/06/x-man-with-x-ray-eyes-im-looking.html


The House of Usher
ClassicBecky 
http://classicbeckybrainfood.blogspot.com/2010/05/house-of-usher-perfectly-poe.html


  Frankenstein Unbound 
Chris Michael 
http://forgottenclassicsofyesteryear.blogspot.com/2011/06/chris-michaels-review-of-frankenstein.html

There you go folks!  Enjoy the last day of this magnificent blogathon!

Also...remember:

VOTE FOR THE TOPIC OF THE NEXT BLOGATHON BY VOTING AT THE POLL ON THIS SITE!!  ANYONE CAN VOTE!!!!

Also....one last thing....on Monday I will post instructions for how you all can vote for the Readers' Choice Award.




BLOGATHON DAY #2

It's day two of Forgotten Classics of Yesteryear's Roger Corman Blogathon!
Many thanks to the people who have already participated!  But now we have eight more terrific entries!


Little Shop of Horrors 
Page
http://myloveofoldhollywood.blogspot.com/2011/06/little-shop-of-horrors-1960-photo.html


The Haunted Palace
Rachel 
http://thegirlwiththewhiteparasol.blogspot.com/2011/06/movie-review-haunted-palace.html


 Tower of London
Kevyn Knox 
http://themostbeautifulfraudintheworld.blogspot.com/2011/06/roger-cormans-fancifully-macabre.html

 
The St. Valentine's Day Massacre
Tom 
http://motionpicturegems.blogspot.com/2011/06/st-valentines-day-massacre-1967.html

 
Tomb of Ligeia
Rick 
http://classic-film-tv.blogspot.com/2011/06/roger-corman-blogathon-creating.html


Five Guns West 
Toby 
http://fiftieswesterns.wordpress.com/2011/06/18/the-roger-corman-blogathon-five-guns-west-1955/


Creature From the Haunted Sea
W.B. Kelso
http://microbrewreviews.blogspot.com/search/label
/Creature%20from%20the%20Haunted%20Sea

 
Sorority Girl
Thomas Duke 
http://cinemagonzo.blogspot.com/2011/06/sorority-girl-1957-portrait-of.html

Remember to be kind and leave lots of comments so people will know that you read their work!

Once again, thank you to all of the participants!  Well...let's get a-bloggin'!

Editor in Chief
Nathanael Hood

Thursday, June 16, 2011

BLOGATHON DAY #1

Well....the first day of the blogathon is here!!


We've got seven great entries for you today! Here they are:


Tales of Terror- Jaime Grijalba
http://exodus8-2.blogspot.com/2011/06/tales-of-terror-1962.html


The Wild Angels- Ivan Lerner
http://ivanlandia1.blogspot.com/2011/06/wild-angels-roger-corman-invents-biker.html


The Day the World Ended– Stacia
http://www.shebloggedbynight.com/2011/06/roger-corman-blogathon-day-world-ended.html


GAS-S-S-S- Gary Cahall
http://www.moviefanfare.com/from-the-files-of-dr-strangefilm/dr-strangefilm-case-021-gas-s-s-s/



Boxcar Bertha- Michaël Parent
http://cinephiliaque.blogspot.com/2011/06/boxcar-bertha.html


Bloody Mama- John Greco
http://twentyfourframes.wordpress.com/2011/06/17/bloody-mama-1970-roger-corman/


Sorority Girl- Thomas Duke
http://cinemagonzo.blogspot.com/

Thank you to all the participants!

Well...let's get a-bloggin'!

Editor-in-Chief
Nathanael Hood

Wednesday, June 15, 2011

FINAL BLOGATHON SCHEDULE


Alright, folks! The final schedule for the Roger Corman Blogathon has been decided! Here are the dates and links to the websites:

June 17th:
-Tales of Terror- Jaime Grijalba (http://Exodus8-2.blogspot.com)
-The Wild Angels- Ivan Lerner (http://ivanlandia1.blogspot.com/)
-The Day the World Ended– Stacia (http://www.shebloggedbynight.com)
-GAS-S-S-S- Gary Cahall (http://www.moviefanfare.com/category/from-the-files-of-dr-strangefilm/)
-Boxcar Bertha- Michaël Parent (http://cinephiliaque.blogspot.com/)
-Bloody Mama- John Greco (http://twentyfourframes.wordpress.com/)
-Sorority Girl- Thomas Duke (http://cinemagonzo.blogspot.com/)

June 18th:
-Little Shop of Horrors- Page (http://myloveofoldhollywood.blogspot.com/)
-The Haunted Palace- Rachel (http://thegirlwiththewhiteparasol.blogspot.com/)
-Tower of London- Kevyn Knox (http://themostbeautifulfraudintheworld.blogspot.com/)
-The St. Valentine's Day Massacre- Tom (http://motionpicturegems.blogspot.com)
-Tomb of Ligeia- Rick (http://classic-film-tv.blogspot.com/)
-Five Guns West – Toby (fiftieswesterns.com)
-Creature From the Haunted Sea- W.B. Kelso (http://microbrewreviews.blogspot.com/)

June 19th:
-The Intruder- Jack Lunt (http://jacklfilmreviews.blogspot.com/)
-The Masque of the Red Death- S.M. Rana (http://smrana.blogspot.com/)
-The Raven- Michael Troutman (http://ishootthepictures.blogspot.com/)
-A Bucket of Blood - Ivan G Shreve Jr (http://thrillingdaysofyesteryear.blogspot.com)
-X: The Man With the X-Ray Eyes- Team Bartilucci (http://doriantb.blogspot.com/)
-Frankenstein Unbound – Chris Michael (http://forgottenclassicsofyesteryear.blogspot.com/)
-The House of Usher- ClassicBecky (http://www.classicbeckybrainfood.blogspot.com)

I'll do a post every day of the blogathon that will restate the links for the day's participants.

On Monday the 20th, all of the participants must email me their selections for the Reader's Choice Award. The only rule is that you cannot vote for yourself!

On Wednesday the 22nd, I'll announce the third place winner and and the Reader's Choice Award.

On Thursday the 23rd, I'll announce the second place winner.

Finally, on Friday the 24th, I'll announce the grand prize winner!

Each award will be accompanied by a banner that the winner can post on their site. I will personally email the first place winner so we can discuss which movies they want for their grand prize.

See you all Friday!

Editor-in-Chief
Nathanael Hood

Sunday, June 12, 2011

Love Me Tonight

Directed by Rouben Mamoulian
1932
The United States of America


It used to be that actors didn’t need an excuse to burst out into song. Ecstatic joy, crumbling despair, and sheer boredom were all triggers for exultations of music. It was a different time...a time when actors and actresses were expected to be able to sing, dance, and act for their paycheck. Perennial tough men like James Cagney could even be found cutting the carpet and singing to the rafters. It was a time of sequins and tap shoes, of lavish sets and legions of extras, of breathtaking gowns and smart suits. It was the time of Hollywood musicals.

Perhaps there has always been an urge to direct the silver screen towards song and dance. After all, the first talkie, The Jazz Singer (1927), featured seven songs and only a few lines of dialogue. Two years later, the first authentic musical, The Broadway Melody (1929), was so successful that it inspired three sequels and won the Academy Award for Best Picture. But these were still clumsy, uneven affairs. Early musicals were still largely tied to vaudevillian roots, featuring over-the-top acting, boring staging, and clunky songs. The early musicals were also almost always about the backstage antics of stage productions. It seemed as if these musicals were composited from two completely different films: gritty and realistic drama about struggling entertainers and lavish, fantastical musical segments that promoted escapism from the very problems experienced by the cast.

What a blessing Rouben Mamoulian was! What freedom he provided! While other musicals were chained to the stage, Mamoulian took his musicals out into the streets, into the homes, and throughout the countryside. His innovations may seem obvious to modern day moviegoers: a free moving camera, quick scene transitions, and double-channel soundtracks with overlapping dialogue. But they literally revolutionized both the screen and musical industries. Mamoulian’s films focused on every day people instead of actors and actresses. The musical numbers were woven seamlessly into the action, providing unheard of freedom to the action. His dialogue was fast and witty and actually helped progress the plot and lead into the musical numbers. His greatest triumph, Love Me Tonight (1932) did nothing less than to change the face of musical pictures forever.

From the very first minute of the film, viewers from the 30s must have known that they were in for something different. It opened not with a song, but with a “symphony of noises.” We see empty Parisian streets early in the morning before the city comes to life. Suddenly, we hear the THUD THUD of a man fixing street pavement with a spade.


It continues in rhythmic time: THUD THUD...THUD THUD...THUD THUD...Then, we hear a vagabond snoring behind a mountain of barrels.


His snores weave into the heartbeat of the city. A woman starts to sweep her front porch. Smokestacks come to life. Alarm clocks go off. Babies commence to wail. Soon, the entire city of Paris is alive.


Each citizen adds to the rhythmic collage of sound. It is a fascinating scene even by today’s standards. Without surrendering a single note of music, Mamoulian has created his first song: the sounds of Paris.

But then a second, proper song starts. As the camera zooms into an empty window, we meet our hero, Maurice Courtelin, a simple street tailor. He starts to sing about the city of Paris:

It has taxi horns and claxons
To scare the Anglo-Saxons.
That’s the song of Paree.


He then bursts onto the street, continuing his song as he interacts with his fellow Parisians as the camera tracks him in one continuous shot:

Maurice: (To a shopkeeper) How’s your business?
Shopkeeper: How can it fail?
Maurice: (To an old man) How’s your grandpa?
Old Man: He’s back in jail.


Mamoulian has freed the musical from the stage and made even passing extras co-stars. But the innovations don’t stop there. Probably the film’s most famous number is the delightful “Isn’t it Romantic?” It starts with Maurice in his shop signing about the joys of love and romance. His song goes out into the street where a man getting into a cab hears it and starts to sing where Maurice left off. Both the man and the taxi driver continue the song.


The man then gets off the taxi and onto a train where the song is then picked up by a group of traveling soldiers.


The soldiers then transfer the song to a gypsy violinist.



The song finally comes to rest when they are overheard by the young Princess Jeanette.


As she starts to croon the melody, the audience comes to a startling realization: we have been introduced to the romantic interest in the film through the power of song. Through technological prowess, Mamoulian has fated the two lovers with a melody before they have even met.

How they meet is typical Hollywood whimsy: a member of Jeanette’s family has worked up a sizable bill for Maurice, yet refuses to pay. So he travels to their castle to collect, but instead falls madly in love with Jeanette. He has himself introduced as “Baron Courtelin” and convinces the entire family that he is of noble blood. And then the wooing begins. He slowly convinces Jeanette to love him while winning over her family.


But he eventually cannot stand lying anymore so he reveals that he is merely a tailor to Jeanette. She runs off, horrifies, and leaves Maurice heart-broken. He is revealed to the family as, GASP, a commoner and is quickly kicked out. But Jeanette succumbs to her feelings and runs off after Maurice. The whole story leads to a strange scene where she chases after Maurice’s train while on horseback, professes her love through an open window, and then forces the train to stop after playing a dangerous game of chicken.

Of course, as a musical, the plot is secondary to the music. But Mamoulian adds extra dimensions to this relatively straightforward film. He develops Jeanette into a symbol of sexual repression. In one particularly revealing scene, Jeanette tells Maurice that she has already been widowed once before. She was married at nineteen years old to a seventy year old aristocrat who died the following year. As such, her family insists that she remarry a man of her own station. The only problem is that the only two men that fit that description are as old as her first husband. So Jeanette is stuck in a perpetual state of sexual dissatisfaction. In one scene, when Maurice enters, her immediate reaction is to run up to him and shout, “A man!” But this begs the question as to why she repels Maurice at the start of their courtship. Could it be that she literally does not know how to react in such a situation? After all, at twenty-two years old all of her previous courting had been done for her. This may, in fact, be the first time that somebody who reciprocates her affection fought for it with such passion. This is especially obvious in a charged scene where Maurice measures a scantily clad (for the 30s) Jeanette when she tears her gown. Watch Jeanette’s face. She is obviously uncomfortable with how Maurice is touching her. But is it out of modesty or the fact that she has never been touched that way before? After all, her brief marriage to the old aristocrat didn’t bear any children.


This film is also a telling indictment of class and social barriers in the late 19th, early 20th century. Despite her great affections, the realization that Maurice is a common tailor is enough to send her running. In one of the film’s last songs, the staff that works at Jeanette’s castle sings about their total indignation that their hard work would be wasted on someone of their own stature. It isn’t an ironic song, either. The staff is genuinely offended that they had to wait on one of their own. As for Jeanette, it is only after she rejects her family and position that she is able to accept Maurice as her lover.


Of course the film ends with the separated lovers embracing. The plot is rather formulaic. But it is director Mamoulian’s astounding directing that makes it extraordinary. The songs are seamlessly integrated into the action and story. We are whisked away to lands beyond the stage. Indeed, Mamoulian succeeded in making all of Paris and its countryside the stage. Future musicals would build off Mamoulian’s foundation. After all, in the early 30s, the film musical was still in its infancy. But while young, Love Me Tonight was the first giant step that musicals took to achieve their eventual greatness.

Editor's Note: This entire film has been posted on this blog's youtube account. Look to the sidebar for a link.


Sources:
http://www.filmsite.org/musicalfilms.html
http://www.jeanetteandnelson.net/films/jeanette/jm-loveme.htm

Monday, June 6, 2011

The Phenix City Story

Directed by Phil Karlson
1955
The United States of America


It’s not easy to startle or offend me anymore these days. I guess that I have just seen too many movies. I’ve seen every kind of villain commit every kind of evil imaginable: Hannibal Lector eating a man’s face, Marty Augustine destroying an innocent woman’s face, Amon Goeth playing the piano while Jews are gunned down in their homes. I’ve seen every kind of gore and violent effects: Lionel Cosgrove standing ankle deep in zombie blood and guts, Marion Crane being stabbed in the shower, Derek Vinyard curb-stomping a black teenager in the middle of the street. And finally, I’ve seen every act of kindness and righteousness: George Bailey saving Bedford Falls, black witnesses in the balcony standing for Atticus Finch, Will Kane standing alone against four ruthless killers. I’ve seen every act of compassion, villainy, and nobility that the imagination can muster and then-some.

Over my movie-watching career, I’ve noticed that more and more films rely on the shocking and visceral, the gory and exploitative, the base and disgusting to attract audiences. There is a belief that movies have to out-do each other and directors one-up each other. As a result, simple things like suspense and genuine human drama have become rare commodities. That’s why I adore the old masters of suspense like Alfred Hitchcock, Henri-Georges Clouzot, and early John Carpenter. But even now, their films are rapidly aging. I don’t squirm as much when Alice Huberman knocks over the bottle of uranium. I don’t get quite as powerful a stomach-ache when Mario and Jo have to drive their jerrycan over that old rickety bridge. I don’t cover my eyes when I know that Michael Myers may not be on the screen, but he is in the room. As B.B. King once crooned, the thrill is gone.

Or at least I thought so.

Imagine my surprise when I discovered a little known film entitled The Phenix City Story, a curious little film noir from the mid-50s. It was directed by Phil Karlson, a man who was known more for the quantity of films he could make than their quality (he released eight films in 1946). It featured a cast of small-time, marginally successful actors like John McIntire and Richard Kiley. And finally, it was set not in a big, sprawling urban hell-scape like New York, Chicago, or Los Angeles, but in the small town of Phenix City. Alabama, current population approximately 30,000 people. And yet, I can say that this is unequivocally one of the most intense, suspenseful, and shocking films that I have ever seen in my entire life. Yes, I am serious. I am ranking this film up there with the famous films that I have so far mentioned in this review. So powerful was The Phenix City Story that I had to literally stop the film at three different times, walk away, and recollect myself and my nerve before I could continue. Don’t let the fact that it was released in the 50s fool you. The Phenix City Story is not a film for the weak at heart or the fragile of temperament. To watch this film is to endure a crucible of agony and fury. It is a film of monstrous evil, heart-breaking sacrifice, and selfless heroism.

The most amazing part is that The Phenix City Story is based on a true story. The film revolves around the real-life assassination of Albert Patterson, a 1954 candidate for Alabama attorney general, in Phenix City. The film somewhat awkwardly begins and ends with brief newsreels that address the real-life events the film was based on. These include interviews with participants in the story by journalism legend Clete Roberts. The newsreels may seem like a cumbersome and cheap device for providing extra thrills. But watch how the newsreels set up the story for the viewer. In thirteen minutes the entire stage for the movie is set: Phenix City, Alabama was once the center of vice and sin in the South. Despite its small size it was a hotspot for gambling, prostitution, and other illegal rackets that were viciously controlled by the mob. Clete Roberts speaks with a man who tells him that he always carries a gun around for fear of retaliation from the mob for his involvement in the assassination case. As a result, we learn that not only was the mob an overpowering force, they had no qualm with murdering innocent bystanders who got in the way.

Facts are meted out with calm precision. Albert Patterson was running for Alabama attorney general on a campaign that promised a crackdown on the mob and illegal activities. As a result, he was murdered. It was then left to his son, John Patterson, to take up his father’s mantel and drive the mob out of town by calling in the national guard, placing Phenix City under martial law, and forcing the mob into court. The newsreel literally spoils the entire film for the viewer. And yet, it does nothing to detract from the overall power of the film.

Once the film itself begins we are plunged into a city with two faces. On the outside there are sunny streets and bright window fronts.


But the other face is of a twisted center of crime, populated primarily by gangsters who attend to the needs of GIs from an army base one town over.

When people try to confront the gangsters, they are savagely beaten in the middle of the street. Fat, well-paid policemen ignore the slaughter. When people beg them to stop the violence, they infuriatingly reply, “Oh, they’re just having fun.”


But the Patterson family decides to fight back after their son John comes home from Germany after serving on the courts at the Nuremberg War Trials. After seeing justice served to mass murderers, war criminals, and genocidal maniacs in Europe, John is determined to clean up the streets.


But the mob fights back with brutal tactics. A black friend of the Patterson family has their young daughter picked up, murdered, and thrown onto their front yard.


Gangsters use their cars to savagely run over other children. Men are beaten, women are assaulted and brutally raped, and people who investigate the attacks are killed. Another family friend is murdered and thrown in a ditch after discovering the car used to kill a young child. Irrefutable evidence is presented in court, both identifying the driver and solidifying his guilt as the murderer. The jury rules not guilty.

Finally, John’s father, Albert, decides to run for attorney general to clean up the town once and for all. His campaign is brutally attacked. Voters are intimidated and beaten at the poll stations, campaign trucks are overturned and set on fire, and, once again, little children who pass out pamphlets are assaulted.


But when he wins a preliminary election, the mob assassinates him in the middle of the street. I won’t explain what happens next, as I don’t want to rob you of the power contained within the last scenes. But they are nigh unbearable.


Such a film took amazing courage to make. It was made less than a year after the events it depicted took place. Many of the mobsters portrayed in the film were still in trial. Some of them were still on the street. Phil Karlson’s attention to detail was so great that he even had some of his actors wear the actual clothes of their real-life counterparts. Amazingly, this included having the actor portraying Albert Patterson wear the actual suit that the real Patterson was assassinated in. The film ends with another newsreel that shows the real life John Patterson swearing to continue his father’s fight.

So I return to the original point of this article: how did this movie shock and amaze me after being so desensitized by other movies? Perhaps it is the film’s brutal honesty in depicting the battle between good and evil. The photography and pacing are frenetic and violent all on their own. But methinks that it has more to do with the story. The central story is so compelling, so outrageous, and so devastating that it is impossible not to feel anger or sorrow towards what happens on-screen. I will continue to ruminate on why this film is so powerful. But in the meantime, I will post this article, shake my head, and step outside for a moment so I can catch my breath.

Sources:
http://www.noiroftheweek.com/2008/05/phenix-city-story-1955.html
http://www.tcm.com/this-month/article/374120|0/Cult-Movie-Picks-April-2011.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Phenix_City_Story
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0048488/trivia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phenix_City,_Alabama