Directed by H. C. Potter, Joseph A. McDonough, Edward Cline
1941
The United States of America
Deep within the bowels of Hell, demons stuff victims dressed in
lavish fashions into giant barrels labeled “Canned Guy” and “Canned
Gal.” As they sharpen their pitchforks, turn women in expensive dresses
on spits over open fires, and torment the eternally damned, they sing a
happy song.
Hellzapoppin/Ol’ Satan’s on a tear
Hellzapoppin/They’re screamin’ everywhere
See the Inferno/of Vaudeville
Anything can happen/And it probably will!!
Suddenly
a taxi appears and two beleaguered men fly out onto the ground after a
tidal wave of ducks, dogs, and other animals inexplicably crammed into
the back seat. One looks up and mutters to the other: “That’s the first
taxi driver that ever went straight where I told him to!” These two
unfortunates are vaudevillian legends Ole Olsen and Chic Johnson. They
have arrived in Hell for possibly the most nightmarish reason of all:
making a Hollywood film. For they have been given the grim
responsibility of making Hellzapoppin’, perhaps the most
subversively anarchic comedy to ever spring from the forehead of the
Hollywood studio system. Is it any wonder why at the beginning we are
treated to a title card reading: “......any similarity between
HELLZAPOPPIN’ and a motion picture is purely coincidental.”
Hellzapoppin’
was an “adaptation” of a musical revue written by Olsen and Johnson
that had been a smash hit on Broadway, running for more than 3 years for
1,404 performances. At the time, it was the longest-running Broadway
musical in history. The revue was a model of controlled chaos. As
reporter Celia Wren recounted: “The smash hit "Hellzapoppin" was a
smorgasbord of explode-the-fourth-wall nuttiness: sight gags; comedy
songs; skits abandoned partway through; cameos by audience stooges; an
absurdist raffle; and in a trademark stunt, a man who wandered through
the theater hawking an ever-larger potted tree.” So Olsen and
Johnson were confronted with a problem: how do you adapt a musical with
no real plot that heavily relied on an interactive circus atmosphere?
The answer was to make a movie about Olsen and Johnson trying to make a movie of Hellzapoppin’. Confused yet? Let me explain.
After
the opening number in Hell, it is revealed that it is all a Hollywood
sound stage. They are confronted by a director (Richard Lane) and a
nervous screenwriter (Elisha Cook Jr.) who want to pitch them a script
for the film. The suggested film is about a love triangle between three
“disgusting rich” aristocrats: “young fella” Woody Taylor (Lewis
Howard), playwright Jeff Hunter (Robert Paige), and wannabe actress
Kitty Rand (Jane Frazee). Kitty is putting on a Red Cross benefit at her
estate and Olsen and Johnson are hired as prop-men. As Woody, Jeff, and
Kitty play their game of romantic musical chairs, Olsen and Johnson run
about trying to gather all of the outlandish props that the show will
need. Later, when they realize that Kitty will marry the wrong man if
the show is a success, they sabotage the benefit with a menagerie of
pranks and tricks. Other notable characters include Hugh Herbert as
Quimby, a detective and master of disguises who bounces around the film
spreading chaos wherever he goes like a mythical trickster, Mischa Auer
as Prince Pepi, a lecherous European aristocrat who poses as a fraud for
free food and sympathy, and Martha Raye as Betty Johnson, Chic’s
man-hungry, vivacious sister.
To add to the mayhem, there is another
layer to the narrative: an easily distracted projectionist played by
Shemp Howard who literally runs the film from his booth. Throughout the
film he interacts with both Olsen and Johnson in the framing narrative
and Olsen and Johnson in the film-within-the-film. Many of the film’s
best gags come from their interactions: he repeatedly fails to keep the
camera focused on the principle characters (instead turning the camera
to beautiful women), he gets reels mixed up and throws the unfortunate
duo into a Western, and, in the film’s most ingenious gag, gets the film
stuck, thereby trapping half of the characters onscreen in the bottom
half of the frame and the other half in the top half of the frame. These
gags are not only effective; they also demonstrate the duo’s ability to
appropriate the capabilities (and limitations) of the cinematic medium
for comedic purposes.
It’s an unwritten rule that a musical is only as good as its musical numbers. So, thankfully, Hellzapoppin’ does not contain any musical misfires. Two numbers in particular almost knock the house down. The first is Watch the Birdie,
an impromptu ode to photography wherein Raye almost steals the whole
damn picture away from Olsen and Johnson. As she sings and swings with
all of the skill and abandon that only a lifelong vaudevillian can
muster, footage of people diving into a pool is paused, reversed, and
played over and over again.
The second number is a show-stopping Lindy
Hop performed by the black employees of Kitty’s estate. Much like a
similar sequence in the Marx Brothers classic A Day at the Races
(1937), the Lindy Hop number gave a chance for otherwise disenfranchised
black performers to demonstrate their ferocious talents.
Also like many of the Marx Brothers’ films, Hellzapoppin’
devotes a couple of musical numbers to the bland romantic couples who,
for the most part, serve as dull straight-men (and women) to the madcap
antics of the film’s stars. But surprisingly, Hellzapoppin’
managed to make these segments memorable as well. One early sappy love
ballad is frequently interrupted by title cards announcing: “Attention
Please! If Stinky Miller is in the audience -- GO HOME!”
Another
ballad is intercut with sequences of choreographed synchronized
swimmers, predicting similar numbers in future films starring Esther
Williams. But even more fascinating is how the filmmakers transitioned
between shots of the singers and shots of the swimmers: they would
frequently take a close-up of an inconsequential object, like a white
rose or a fan, and do a fade-in of the swimmers arranged in a similar
pattern.
These sequences speak to the underlying genius of Hellzapoppin’: it is just as much a piece of cinema as
it is an adaptation of a theatrical musical. Instead of simply moving
from one to the other via an edit or a tracking shot, the filmmakers
utilized a technique that would have been nearly impossible to replicate
on stage. But in fact, most of the film could be described that way. I
couldn’t imagine a film like Hellzapoppin’ existing (and
succeeding) in any other medium. Ingeniously metafictional, distinctly
cinematic, ruthlessly creative, joyfully anarchic, and most importantly,
deliriously entertaining, Hellzapoppin’ is a treasure of the American musical comedy tradition.